The Socioeconomic State of the Breedlove Family

 After reading the first section of The Bluest Eye, I was introduced to a plethora of new characters and placed into a 19th century society filled with misery and despair in the Midwestern black community. One key character I was introduced to was Pecola, the intimidated product of the hate and reproach her family received. Pecola blames this blatant mistreatment on her self-defining ugliness, as kids in school ignore her due to her hideous appearance. However, what Pecola fails to acknowledge behind the mask of her ugliness is that the true reason for her mistreatment is her blackness, and more precisely, her family's socioeconomic status. 


    The Breedlove family is not your average black, mid-western family. While most black families would be considered lower class during this time period, the Breedloves took it a step farther, living in a rotting storefront filled with mangled furniture and an overwhelming sense of joylessness. According to Morrison, "They lived there because they were poor and black, and they stayed there because they believed they were ugly" (Morrison 38). The twofold nature of the Breedlove's social impoverishment, their socially-inferior blackness and their severe poverty, thrust them to the bottom of the social pyramid, leaving them no room for upward mobility. Society labeled them as ugly and worthless - giving them two options - accept their social "ugliness" or fight to break free from this social identity. However, the Breedloves' hand was forced, as their lack of strength and interfamilial conflict left them with little care for their social reputation. 

    What I found most interesting about the Breedlove's socioeconomic status is their relative poverty within the black community. I often find that literature and social stereotypes label  the mid-19th century population as inherently lower class, without acknowledging the intricacies of status within the black community. The black community does not have one defined social status, but many, and these discrepancies can lead to even further social alienation.

Comments

  1. Dylan's English BlogSeptember 27, 2023 at 6:53 PM

    Nice post Ben. I tend to agree with many of your points regarding the fact that the complexities of Black socioeconomic levels are often rarely explored. But their socioeconomic status is not very unique for the time especially since Black Americans were historically repressed around this time. I feel another key difference between the Breedloves and other families of similar status is how they view themselves. They don't try to find the bright side in their poverty, or pull themselves out of it. Where many other families find solace in community and commiseration with others facing similar hardships the Breedloves find it in isolation. The biggest reason the breedloves are so different from everyone else is that they accept their situation and don't see a real problem with their status.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Nameless Characters?

Image
        One of the first things that stood out to me while reading the first section of  When the Emperor was Divine was the decision of the author, Julie Otsuka, to omit the names of the characters, simply addressing them as "the woman," "the girl," or "the boy." There are plenty of reasons why Otsuka may have made this decision, and ultimately, we will never know without her outright explanation. Nevertheless, Otsuka's decision is a unique one, and one that most definitely was meant to serve a greater purpose in the understanding of the novel. Thus, my goal in this blog is to speculate as why Otsuka may have made such a radical literary move...         One possible reason for this decision is to take a step towards presenting the characters of the novel through the lens of American society. The Japanese population was not seen for their individual identities by the majority of the American people, seeing them instead as mere members of a threatening
Read more

The "Villain" in Kavalier and Clay

Image
 The "Villain" in Kavalier and Clay: In Kavalier and Clay, there is no singular villain. It is impossible to identify one person as the overarching villain like you can in Star Wars or Harry Potter or any Shakespearean work, but instead a group of people and/or ideology. For Joe, the villain is the Nazi regime, and by extension, the German population. Joe sees every German he comes across as the enemy, an extension of Adolf Hitler's deadly hand. Joe's life has been wrecked by the Nazis - he was forced to abandon his family, he lost his brother, his only beacon of hope, and has turned him into a marginalized spectacle of society as a Jewish refugee. Joe takes out this anger on every German he faces, judging them for their nationality and not for their personal values. For example, Joe's mission to kill the German scientist residing in Antartica was not at all a reflection of his hatred for the scientist himself, but instead his hatred for the German regime for whi
Read more

Analyzing the Mother: Why so nonchalant?

Image
        While reading the first section of When the Emperor was Divine , the mother's calm, nonchalant attitude stood out to me. Amidst a life-changing tragedy where you and your family are taken from your home to an open-air prison with no set return-date, I would expect a little concern. However, the mother goes about her business emotionless: killing their family dog like it is a bothersome chore, letting the family bird free with no parting words or emotions, or as Otsuka put it, "followed the rules" (9). One could chalk up this emotional disconnect from the narration of the story, being a manifestation of the emotional disconnection shown through the lack of names given the characters, but it also could be seen as a reflection of the woman's mental state.         Is the woman's nonchalance the result of her expectation? Did she expect this sort of incarceration was looming, allowing her to mentally prepare for the situation  she was about to face? This is a p
Read more